French-Fry Fuel
You are reading the text-only copy of this article. To access the article as it appeared in PassageMaker Magazine, please log in to purchase and download the PDF version of this article.
IT’S IN THE NEWS EVERY DAY, IF NOT EVERY HOUR:
petropolitics, the current volatility of the Middle
East and its valuable oil supply. The industrial
might, economy and defense of our country are
all too dependent on a tenuous overseas supply
of petroleum.
What if we could substantially reduce that
dependency using a domestically supplied
energy source? Several U.S. government
agencies, along with countless private
enterprises, are working on an answer to this
very question.
The alternatives include propane and natural
gas, methanol, fuel cells and solar power. But
there is another alternative fuel that may hold
the key at least to reducing this country’s current
dependence on mineral-based petroleum, both
foreign and domestic: biodiesel.
Biodiesel (BD) is the generic name given to a
liquid fuel derived from vegetable oils, animal
fats, cooking oils and greases. These may be
virgin or re-refined from restaurant deep fryers.
That’s right—the same oil that your French fries
or onion rings were cooked in today may power
your diesel engine tomorrow.
Unfortunately, these oils cannot go straight from the vegetable press to the fuel tank. Some
experimental diesel engine vehicles have
actually run across the country on raw fast-food
deep-fryer oils, but this is purely experimental
and not practical. These raw greases solidify to
the consistency of lard or butter at the relatively
high temperature of 50–60 degrees Fahrenheit.
In order to prevent this, the experimental
vehicles utilize fuel system heaters (tank, fuel
lines, filters—everything must be kept warm) to
keep the oil from congealing. If you’ve ever
cleaned a deep fryer, you know how difficult
this can be.
French Fries And Onion Bits
In order to produce BD, these oils go through
a sophisticated refining process known as
esterification. In this veggie “cracking”
procedure, the oils and fats are filtered to
remove water and contaminants (for recycled
cooking oils this may include French fries and
onion bits). These fats and oils are then
chemically reacted with alcohol, most often
methanol, and a catalyst, usually sodium or
potassium hydroxide, which produces a
chemical compound known as fatty acid methyl esters, or FAMEs. When intended for use as a
motor fuel, FAMEs are termed biodiesel. A
useful byproduct of this process is glycerol,
which may be used in cosmetics and
pharmaceuticals.
About half of the biodiesel industry is capable
of using any fat or vegetable oil, including
recycled cooking grease, as “crude.” The
remainder of the industry is limited to using
virgin vegetable oils, the least expensive and
most available of which is soy oil. In fact, the
soybean industry has been responsible for much
of the commercialization of BD as a result of
declining prices for their product and excess
production. In simple terms, there’s too much
supply and not enough demand. BD production
may change that scenario in the not too distant
future. The same issues apply to the recycled
restaurant grease and animal fats industry,
although their product is less expensive than
other raw oils, such as soy and rapeseed.
Fill’er Up
At this point you may be asking, if biodiesel is
so good, why aren’t there biodiesel pumps at
every filling station and fuel dock? The reasons
are many and varied.
The primary disadvantage of BD, and the
hurdle it must overcome in order to become
more widely used in this country, is its high cost.
Depending on where and how much you
purchase, BD costs anywhere from $1.50 to
$3.50 per gallon, and this fluctuates depending
on the price of the crude stock, be it soybeans
or used fast-food deep-fry fat.
Other obstacles biodiesel faces include high
“cloud” and “pour” points. The former is the
temperature at which diesel, or any fuel, begins
to form wax crystals (the fuel actually looks
cloudy), which will clog fuel filters until the
temperature rises. Naturally, this is a problem for
cold weather operation. The latter refers to the
fuel’s ability to remain in a liquid state. BD will,
because of its vegetable oil ancestry, thicken at
a relatively high temperature. The cloud and
pour points of pure biodiesel (referred to as
B100, or 100 percent biodiesel, as opposed to a
mixture of ordinary diesel fuel and biodiesel)
are 12–60 degrees Fahrenheit and 5–55 degrees
Fahrenheit, respectively. This is a comparatively
wide gap and one that would cause some
concern even in temperate areas. Typically,
however, anecdotal evidence indicates that
problems begin to arise at about 40 degrees.
As a comparison, conventional No. 2 diesel
fuel, 2D, should possess a cloud point of
between 15 and 34 degrees. It should, however,
be at least 10 degrees below the lowest
temperature at which the engine or vessel will
be operated. Pour point varies by season, region
and refinery, but it usually ranges from 0–10
degrees Fahrenheit.
s indicated above, the operating temperature
gap between bio and conventional diesel is
considerable. It can cause problems in cool
weather. This deficit may be mitigated by mixing
biodiesel with conventional diesel at anywhere
from a 1:19 to 1:4 ratio, biodiesel to
conventional diesel.
Industry Roadblock
Another considerable stumbling block that
stands in the way of widespread acceptance and
use of BD is the resistance of diesel engine
manufacturers. While they are nearly unanimous
in their desire to embrace alternative fuels,
especially those that fall under the umbrella of
governmental incentives or environmental
legislation, as BD does, some stop short of
endorsing biodiesel. For example, Caterpillar’s
literature says, “Caterpillar neither approves nor prohibits the use of biodiesel fuels” and
Cummins’ indicates that “biodiesel fuels must be
considered experimental at this time” and adds
that “failures caused by the use of biodiesel fuels
are NOT defects of Cummins parts or
workmanship and therefore would NOT be
covered by Cummins’ warranty.” Cummins does
suggest that if BD is used that this be done with
blends of 5 percent (5 percent biodiesel, 95
percent distillate diesel) rather than “neat,” 100
percent biodiesel.
Yanmar’s position is, “up to 5 percent volume
blend RME or SME blend, which complies with
the existing quality standards, should not give end users any serious problems.” A Yanmar
service bulletin goes on to say, “Yanmar,
through this advisory, clarifies the acceptance of
biodiesel blend in diesel fuel only when the
blend does not exceed over 5 percent
biodiesel.” These are not exactly ringing
endorsements of biodiesel, but neither are they
a prohibition against its use.
As with all new technology, however, there
will be a learning and acceptance curve. One
thing that makes the curve steeper is the
propensity of BD to oxidize (essentially rot),
absorb water, support microbial life and turn
acidic over time. Actually, the beauty of BD is
also one of its greatest weaknesses. Its
proponents tout it as environmentally friendly
because it biodegrades. But rotting, waterlogged
fuel that’s eating away at your fuel tank
is not exactly something most cruisers care to
have aboard.
Vessel operators are warned, in some diesel
engine manufacturer literature relating to BD, to
keep vessel tanks as full as possible, protected
from extreme temperatures and limit extended
storage of biodiesel.
It’s difficult to keep real diesel fuel from being
contaminated and going sour; thus, the operator
who chooses to use BD must be doubly cautious about the above-mentioned fuel issues,
among others.
Another particularly vexing problem faced by
BD users is its ability to attack certain rubber
and plastic components, such as fuel lines and
plastic fuel filter bodies and bowls. Some
literature indicates that any natural rubber
components will be affected; others say it’s only
components manufactured before 1994. The fact
is, it’s still a bit of an unknown, so this guideline
should not be taken as an absolute. Bob
Sherman of Diesel Fuel Filtering Inc., of
Alameda, California, reports that BD has
affected his equipment. “It has distorted plastic
filter components and softened Aeroquip fuel
hoses to the point that they can no longer be
used,” he says. His company will no longer filter
fuel from tanks that either contain, or have ever
contained, BD.
The Cleaner, Greener Fuel
This cloud does, however, have a silver lining.
BD’s list of attributes is impressive and lengthy.
Most importantly, it can be produced
domestically and relatively easily. All of the
necessary technology exists and is in operation.
It’s not science fiction; it’s reality. Additionally, it
is environmentally friendly. Without getting too
scientific, diesel engines that use BD will
produce less unburned hydrocarbons, carbon
monoxide, sulfates, aromatic hydrocarbons and
particulate matter. Nitrogen oxide, a harmful
pollutant, does increase slightly with the
burning of BD.
Users of BD report that it does not cause the
noxious exhaust fumes associated with diesel;
instead it produces a pleasant aroma not unlike
that of French fries or popcorn. Additionally,
because soot production is reduced, transoms
tend to stay cleaner. Also of interest to those
who like to give their diesels maximum TLC, BD
has both higher lubricity (the slipperiness of the fuel is important because it acts as a lubricant for
injectors and injection pumps) and cetane. The
latter is a measure of the fuel’s ignition value,
roughly similar to gasoline’s octane index.
Ironically, adding BD to distillate diesel may
actually improve its burning characteristics,
increasing lubricity and cetane while reducing
smoke and its unpleasant odor.
As is often the case, however, there’s a price
to be paid for these advantages. BD is slightly
less potent than ordinary diesel. BD provides
approximately 5–9 percent less energy per
gallon than distillate diesel fuel. Consequently, a
corresponding reduction in available
horsepower and fuel economy will be realized
when using neat BD. Blends, usually in the
5–20-percent BD range, will suffer a less
noticeable loss of power and economy.
As mentioned in the “disadvantages” section,
BD does absorb water and oxidize easily,
making it essentially biodegradable. Also
previously mentioned are the advantages
inherent in this trait. Spilled BD does not present
nearly the ecological concern that spilled
distillate diesel does. That’s not to say it’s OK to
dump gallons of it on land or sea (you may have
a hard time convincing the EPA or Coast Guard
that it’s not diesel fuel, despite its appearance).
Of course, this advantage only applies to pure
BD and not BD-distillate diesel blends.
There are very compelling arguments both for
and against the use of BD. We all want to
maintain our diesels in top running order while
keeping operating and maintenance costs low
and engine reliability high. If you’re like me,
using diesel fuel that’s anything less than the
best, cleanest and most powerful money can
buy, whether it’s in my boat, car or truck, is
unthinkable. The thought of casting off the yoke
of foreign oil dependence while being kinder
and gentler to the environment is, however,
equally as appealing.
If you are considering using BD, check with
your engine manufacturer about guidelines for
your engine and the BD you intend to use.
Every diesel engine manufacturer I contacted
was very responsive on the subject of bio-fuels,
and they all produce written service bulletins
and suggestions on the subject. Additionally,
before making the switch, obtain from the BD
retailer the specification for the BD product they
are offering. Most engine manufacturers have
agreed that in order for their engines to use BD,
it must meet certain agreed-upon standards, one
of which is ASTM standard PS 121-99 (which is
provisional and subject to change) and/or DIN
51606. If the BD retailer will not supply, in
writing, the standard for the fuel he or she is
selling, go elsewhere.
Good Potential
I believe BD holds a great deal of potential for
diesel engine users. When it becomes more
widely accepted, and engine manufacturers
become more familiar with its long-term effects
on their products, it’s likely that the cost of
producing it will decrease. Once it becomes
economically competitive with distillate diesel,
its use will increase, which should reduce
production costs even further.
I’m in agreement with the Cummins service
advisory statement, “Biodiesel must be
considered experimental at this time.” If you opt
to use it, it must be with this notion kept firmly
in mind.
One should also remember the diesel engine
was considered experimental a scant 100 years
ago.
Steve D’Antonio is a PMM contributing editor
and manager at Zimmerman Marine, a custom
boatbuilding and repair yard on Mobjack Bay,
in Cardinal, Virginia.
Reprinted with permission. Copyright 2003 © Dominion Enterprises (888.487.2953) www.passagemaker.com
You are reading the text-only copy of this article. To access the article as it appeared in PassageMaker Magazine, please log in to purchase and download the PDF version of this article.